Max Purcell vs Peter Polansky Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W L L L W L W L
Form
L W L W L L L L L LHead To Head: Purcell 2 - 0 Polansky
They have played 5 sets in total, with Purcell winning 4 and Polansky winning 1. The last match between Purcell and Polansky was at the National Bank Open - Toronto, 05-08-2023, Q1 round, Hard with Max Purcell getting the victory 6-2 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Max Purcell | 2 |
| Peter Polansky | 0 |
National Bank Open - Toronto(05-08-2023)
6
2
6
4
| Purcell | Stats | Polansky |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 2 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 141 | Ranking | 721 |
| 40 | Highest Rank | 110 |
| 27 | Age | 36 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 9 | Titles | 19 |
| 57% (287-215) | Career Total W/L | 56% (541-428) |
| $1,208,460 | Career Prize Money | $541,225 |
| 2 | Hard H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Arnaldi VS Coric PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
23 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Tien VS Giron PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
23 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-4 |
Stats 
Max Purcell
Player
Peter Polansky
54%
(
25 of
46)
1st Serve %
58%
(
38 of
65)
10
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
84%
(
21 of
25)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
12 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
32 of
65)
66
Total Points Won
45
|
||||
| 7-5 3-6 7-6(3) |
Stats
Max Purcell
Player
Peter Polansky
59%
(
64 of
108)
1st Serve %
57%
(
59 of
103)
19
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
4
75%
(
48 of
64)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
39 of
59)
50%
(
22 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
35%
(
38 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
39 of
103)
109
Total Points Won
102
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 29 | Games Won | 23 |
| 29 | Aces (Total) | 9 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 5 |
| 1:49:32 | Average Match Time | 1:49:32 |
| 58% (89/154) | 1st Serve % | 58% (97/168) |
| 78% (69/89) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (59/97) |
| 54% (35/65) | 2nd Serve Win % | 54% (38/71) |
| 57% (8/14) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (5/11) |
| 42% (71/168) | Return Points Win % | 32% (50/154) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (2/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (2/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Max Purcell Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Tommy Paul
Player
Max Purcell
60%
(
28 of
47)
1st Serve %
52%
(
35 of
67)
5
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
3
86%
(
24 of
28)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
74%
(
14 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
19%
(
9 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
67)
69
Total Points Won
45
|
7-5 6-0 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Max Purcell
Player
Aleksandar Vukic
50%
(
53 of
107)
1st Serve %
52%
(
48 of
93)
9
Aces
15
4
Double Faults
5
74%
(
39 of
53)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
32 of
48)
61%
(
33 of
54)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
35 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
39 of
93)
111
Total Points Won
89
|
7-5 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Pablo Carreno-Busta
Player
Max Purcell
63%
(
27 of
43)
1st Serve %
47%
(
21 of
45)
11
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
1
85%
(
23 of
27)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
15 of
21)
81%
(
13 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
7 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
17 of
45)
53
Total Points Won
35
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Max Purcell
Player
Tomas Machac
48%
(
31 of
65)
1st Serve %
64%
(
51 of
80)
15
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
5
94%
(
29 of
31)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
33 of
51)
59%
(
20 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
25%
(
16 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
33 of
80)
82
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Arthur Cazaux
Player
Max Purcell
57%
(
64 of
113)
1st Serve %
55%
(
55 of
100)
7
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
1
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
39 of
55)
67%
(
33 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
34%
(
38 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
34 of
100)
109
Total Points Won
104
|
4-6 7-6(9) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Thanasi Kokkinakis
Player
Max Purcell
59%
(
43 of
73)
1st Serve %
54%
(
56 of
104)
15
Aces
11
1
Double Faults
5
93%
(
40 of
43)
1st Serve Won
84%
(
47 of
56)
80%
(
24 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
21 of
48)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
12%
(
9 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
36 of
104)
100
Total Points Won
77
|
6-7(4) 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Juncheng Shang
Player
Max Purcell
60%
(
45 of
75)
1st Serve %
52%
(
41 of
79)
4
Aces
12
3
Double Faults
2
73%
(
33 of
45)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
32 of
41)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
24 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
30 of
79)
81
Total Points Won
73
|
7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Max Purcell
Player
David Goffin
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve %
77%
(
36 of
47)
8
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
1
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
11 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
19 of
47)
55
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Max Purcell
Player
Christopher O'Connell
59%
(
48 of
81)
1st Serve %
59%
(
54 of
91)
17
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
4
83%
(
40 of
48)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
36 of
54)
61%
(
20 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
26%
(
21 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
34 of
91)
94
Total Points Won
78
|
4-6 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Otto Virtanen
Player
Max Purcell
68%
(
54 of
79)
1st Serve %
65%
(
50 of
77)
19
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
3
80%
(
43 of
54)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
35 of
50)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
28%
(
22 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
33 of
77)
90
Total Points Won
66
|
6-3 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Peter Polansky Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Max Purcell
Player
Peter Polansky
54%
(
25 of
46)
1st Serve %
58%
(
38 of
65)
10
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
84%
(
21 of
25)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
12 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
32 of
65)
66
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Thai Kwiatkowski
Player
Peter Polansky
58%
(
21 of
36)
1st Serve %
63%
(
26 of
41)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
81%
(
17 of
21)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
8 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
52
Total Points Won
25
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Skander Mansouri
Player
Peter Polansky
55%
(
35 of
64)
1st Serve %
65%
(
43 of
66)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
24 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
34 of
66)
74
Total Points Won
56
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Michail Pervolarakis
Player
Peter Polansky
62%
(
16 of
26)
1st Serve %
50%
(
16 of
32)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
75%
(
12 of
16)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
11 of
16)
40%
(
4 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
10 of
16)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
38%
(
10 of
26)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
27
Total Points Won
31
|
5-5 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Roberto Quiroz
Player
Peter Polansky
57%
(
43 of
75)
1st Serve %
56%
(
38 of
68)
9
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
84%
(
36 of
43)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
30 of
38)
59%
(
19 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
11%
(
1 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
27%
(
20 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
20 of
68)
75
Total Points Won
68
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sebastian Fanselow
Player
Peter Polansky
55%
(
31 of
56)
1st Serve %
55%
(
26 of
47)
9
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
1
87%
(
27 of
31)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
20 of
26)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
30%
(
17 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
22 of
47)
61
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Peter Polansky
Player
Jc Aragone
55%
(
30 of
55)
1st Serve %
72%
(
41 of
57)
2
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
2
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
76%
(
19 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
27%
(
15 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
25 of
57)
65
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Peter Polansky
76%
(
48 of
63)
1st Serve %
54%
(
37 of
69)
16
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
27 of
37)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
0%
(
0 of
4)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
29%
(
18 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
21 of
69)
66
Total Points Won
66
|
2-6 7-6(2) 0-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Peter Polansky
Player
Tennys Sandgren
62%
(
71 of
114)
1st Serve %
56%
(
60 of
108)
9
Aces
26
3
Double Faults
10
72%
(
51 of
71)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
50 of
60)
58%
(
25 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
0%
(
0 of
7)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
33%
(
38 of
114)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
32 of
108)
108
Total Points Won
114
|
3-6 7-6(3) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Inaki Montes-De La Torre
Player
Peter Polansky
63%
(
59 of
93)
1st Serve %
55%
(
62 of
112)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
6
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
37 of
62)
59%
(
20 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
38%
(
35 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
50 of
112)
108
Total Points Won
97
|
6-3 4-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 57% (287/215) | Win/Loss | 56% (541/428) |
| 55% (648/539) | Sets Win/Loss | 55% (1253/1017) |
| 51% (5863/5606) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (11403/10573) |
| 59% (209/147) | Hard Win/Loss | 57% (306/227) |
| 54% (29/25) | Clay Win/Loss | 53% (132/118) |
| 51% (24/23) | Indoor Hard W/L | 60% (92/62) |
| 56% (25/20) | Grass Win/Loss | 34% (11/21) |
| 0.56 | Aces Per Game | 0.26 |
| 3164 | Aces Total | 2813 |
| 0.18 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.16 |
| 1013 | Total Double Faults | 1705 |
| 1:33:52 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 441.22 | Average Opponent Rank | 597.04 |
| 59% (20309/34498) | 1st Serve % | 58% (26796/46045) |
| 72% (14718/20309) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (18710/26796) |
| 51% (7170/14188) | 2nd Serve Win % | 52% (10024/19249) |
| 40% (1272/3220) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 40% (1654/4123) |
| 38% (13496/35605) | Return Points Win % | 38% (17382/45889) |
| 44% (17/22) | Slam W/L | 51% (52/49) |
| 43% (10/13) | Masters W/L | 38% (18/30) |
| 0% (0/3) | Cups W/L | 57% (8/6) |
| 44% (39/50) | Main Tour W/L | 41% (32/47) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 60% (157/103) | Challenger W/L | 53% (289/257) |
| 73% (63/23) | Futures W/L | 78% (142/39) |
| 58% (278/480) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 57% (527/932) |
| 31% (5/16) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 26% (7/27) |
| 56% (112/200) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 53% (195/368) |
| 59% (96/164) | Deciding Set Win % | 48% (146/306) |
| 86% (270/233) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (545/464) |
| 14% (270/37) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (545/80) |
| 23% (231/53) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 18% (423/75) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
